Filter-table misselection via handle aliasing
Published Oct 18, 2026 · Updated Oct 18, 2026
Handle aliasing in Linux cls_u32 allows local users to corrupt traffic-filter table selection through crafted table handles. The u32_change function stores explicit handles as raw IDR keys, but deletion uses handle2id, leaking identifiers and making u32_lookup_ht select an unrelated table. Triggering requires traffic-control administration privileges in the relevant network namespace; demonstrated consequences are incorrect table selection and failed table creation, not kernel code execution.
Summary
What happened
Handle aliasing in Linux cls_u32 allows local users to corrupt traffic-filter table selection through crafted table handles. The u32_change function stores explicit handles as raw IDR keys, but deletion uses handle2id, leaking identifiers and making u32_lookup_ht select an unrelated table. Triggering requires traffic-control administration privileges in the relevant network namespace; demonstrated consequences are incorrect table selection and failed table creation, not kernel code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-98629
- Published
- Oct 18, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 18, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 18, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 18, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4403f9293ce9ecc2a55c688d84ee37e3ba0fc1a8
- Affected versionversion=6.11.10 <6.12
- Affected versionversion=6.1.119 <6.1.189
- Affected versionversion=6.12
- Affected versionversion=6.6.63 <6.6.158
- Affected versionversion=73af53d82076bbe184d9ece9e14b0dc8599e6055 <0a5f5d9e94dead312d32c366b917c64e552b72f7
- Affected versionversion=73af53d82076bbe184d9ece9e14b0dc8599e6055 <2f898f9ec7c73c5697ee462681e7ea6984ee1f3d
- Affected versionversion=73af53d82076bbe184d9ece9e14b0dc8599e6055 <54a454c5e41f5e2cb70c8163140ce095c5d5eefd
- Affected versionversion=73af53d82076bbe184d9ece9e14b0dc8599e6055 <f6696481eedfd5752b4b56eed715d0b0fe48b9c5
- Affected versionversion=789f9963bd031c3a185605665b744912df8e7eda <0fac292d93fdb313099e98cce928b3a524c92c94
- Affected versionversion=9b2c3184e126b941dfa716b8128ed6db92a64e2f <21fc07924e996e1e661268ca269c86b8d59d25b3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Activity data is delayed. The latest report is Sep 28, 2026.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
- Upstream cls_u32 handle-aliasing reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Get started to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Get started