Header injection via ineffective CRLF path filtering
Published May 28, 2026 · Updated May 28, 2026
HTTP header injection in Robert Rothenberg Plack::Middleware::Security::Common before 0.13.1 allows remote attackers to bypass path filtering. The header_injection routine rejected double-encoded CRLF in PATH_INFO but failed to reject literal carriage-return and line-feed bytes. The rule must be enabled, and actual header injection depends on proxy and PSGI-server handling because either layer can reject or reinterpret the crafted path.
Summary
What happened
HTTP header injection in Robert Rothenberg Plack::Middleware::Security::Common before 0.13.1 allows remote attackers to bypass path filtering. The header_injection routine rejected double-encoded CRLF in PATH_INFO but failed to reject literal carriage-return and line-feed bytes. The rule must be enabled, and actual header injection depends on proxy and PSGI-server handling because either layer can reject or reinterpret the crafted path.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-9658
- Published
- May 28, 2026
- Updated
- May 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Robert Rothenberg
- Product
- Plack::Middleware::Security::Common
- Classifications
- CWE-790, CWE-113, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 28, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <0.13.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo