Local crash via unchecked compressed-section length
Published May 25, 2026 · Updated May 25, 2026
Heap-based buffer overflow in LibreDWG 0.1 through 0.14 allows local users to crash dwgread with a malformed R2004 DWG file. In read_2004_compressed_section, insufficient decoded-length validation lets memcpy write beyond a preallocated heap buffer. Exploitation requires a local user to invoke dwgread on the crafted file; only a segmentation-fault crash has been demonstrated, not code execution.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in LibreDWG 0.1 through 0.14 allows local users to crash dwgread with a malformed R2004 DWG file. In read_2004_compressed_section, insufficient decoded-length validation lets memcpy write beyond a preallocated heap buffer. Exploitation requires a local user to invoke dwgread on the crafted file; only a segmentation-fault crash has been demonstrated, not code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-9500
- Published
- May 25, 2026
- Updated
- May 25, 2026
- Vendor
- The GnuPG Project
- Product
- LibreDWG
- Classifications
- CWE-119, CWE-122, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 25, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 25, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0.1
- Affected versionversion=0.10
- Affected versionversion=0.11
- Affected versionversion=0.12
- Affected versionversion=0.13
- Affected versionversion=0.14
- Affected versionversion=0.2
- Affected versionversion=0.3
- Affected versionversion=0.4
- Affected versionversion=0.5
- Affected versionversion=0.6
- Affected versionversion=0.7
- Affected versionversion=0.8
- Affected versionversion=0.9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Malformed R2004 DWG proof fileproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo