Command execution via unsanitized diagnostics URL
Published Jul 21, 2026 · Updated Jul 21, 2026
OS command injection in Autel MaxiCharger AC Single firmware through V1.03.51 allows remote attackers to execute commands via GetDiagnostics. The OCPP GetDiagnostics handler passes the server-supplied location URL to a system-like function without sanitization, so shell metacharacters are evaluated. Exploitation requires control of, or the ability to hijack, the charger’s configured OCPP server and yields arbitrary command execution on the charging station.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in Autel MaxiCharger AC Single firmware through V1.03.51 allows remote attackers to execute commands via GetDiagnostics. The OCPP GetDiagnostics handler passes the server-supplied location URL to a system-like function without sanitization, so shell metacharacters are evaluated. Exploitation requires control of, or the ability to hijack, the charger’s configured OCPP server and yields arbitrary command execution on the charging station.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-8986
- Published
- Jul 21, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 21, 2026
- Vendor
- Autel
- Product
- MaxiCharger AC Single
- Classifications
- CWE-78, CAPEC-88, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 21, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 21, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=V1.03.51
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- CyberDanube MaxiCharger GetDiagnostics proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo