Traffic interception via misbound OCSP responses
Published Sep 4, 2026 · Updated Sep 10, 2026
Improper OCSP validation in Snowflake drivers before their fixed releases allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read and modify TLS traffic. The drivers fail to bind responses reliably to the certificate under review and treat definitive verification failures as transient errors. Exploitation requires an on-path position plus the revoked certificate's private key, and impact is confined to data in the intercepted connection.
Summary
What happened
Improper OCSP validation in Snowflake drivers before their fixed releases allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read and modify TLS traffic. The drivers fail to bind responses reliably to the certificate under review and treat definitive verification failures as transient errors. Exploitation requires an on-path position plus the revoked certificate's private key, and impact is confined to data in the intercepted connection.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-85525
- Published
- Sep 4, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 10, 2026
- Vendor
- Snowflake
- Product
- Snowflake JDBC Driver (Thin)
- Classifications
- T1557
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 4, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <4.3.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo