Unauthenticated marker disclosure via missing approval filter
Published Jun 15, 2026 · Updated Jun 15, 2026
Information disclosure in WP Go Maps before 10.0.10 allows remote attackers to read unapproved marker records via public REST requests. The single-marker REST handler returns the full database row for a supplied sequential marker ID without filtering records whose approved field is 0. No authentication, cookie, or nonce is required; an unapproved marker must exist, and enumeration exposes its address, description, coordinates, and other columns.
Summary
What happened
Information disclosure in WP Go Maps before 10.0.10 allows remote attackers to read unapproved marker records via public REST requests. The single-marker REST handler returns the full database row for a supplied sequential marker ID without filtering records whose approved field is 0. No authentication, cookie, or nonce is required; an unapproved marker must exist, and enumeration exposes its address, description, coordinates, and other columns.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-8386
- Published
- Jun 15, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- Vendor
- Code Cabin Pty Ltd
- Product
- WP Go Maps
- Classifications
- CWE-200
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 15, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 15, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <10.0.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- WPScan unauthenticated marker-enumeration proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo