UPF process crash via duplicate PDR accumulation
Published May 10, 2026 · Updated May 10, 2026
Denial of service in Dotouch XproUPF 2.0.0-release-088aa7c4 allows remote authenticated users to crash the UPF process via PFCP requests. Repeated PDR-related PFCP operations for one session accumulate duplicate PDR entries instead of replacing or deleting them, until vlib_worker_loop in libvlib.so aborts. The attacker must reach the adjacent PFCP control-plane interface with low privileges; the demonstrated consequence is a UPF process crash with no reported confidentiality or integrity impact.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in Dotouch XproUPF 2.0.0-release-088aa7c4 allows remote authenticated users to crash the UPF process via PFCP requests. Repeated PDR-related PFCP operations for one session accumulate duplicate PDR entries instead of replacing or deleting them, until vlib_worker_loop in libvlib.so aborts. The attacker must reach the adjacent PFCP control-plane interface with low privileges; the demonstrated consequence is a UPF process crash with no reported confidentiality or integrity impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-8232
- Published
- May 10, 2026
- Updated
- May 10, 2026
- Vendor
- Dotouch
- Product
- XproUPF
- Classifications
- CWE-404, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 10, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.0.0-release-088aa7c4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Duplicate PDR accumulation reproduction procedureproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo