Forced FTP mounts via missing netmount CSRF check
Published Aug 31, 2026 · Updated Sep 1, 2026
CSRF in the PHP connector in Studio 42 Ltd. elFinder before 2.1.70 allows remote attackers to force FTP mounts via cross-site requests. elFinderConnector::$csrfProtectedCmds omits netmount, so validateCsrfToken() is skipped while request parameters flow into the FTP driver. Exploitation requires a victim browser to reach the connector; the request persists an attacker-chosen mount in that session and makes the server send supplied credentials to an attacker-chosen FTP endpoint.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in the PHP connector in Studio 42 Ltd. elFinder before 2.1.70 allows remote attackers to force FTP mounts via cross-site requests. elFinderConnector::$csrfProtectedCmds omits netmount, so validateCsrfToken() is skipped while request parameters flow into the FTP driver. Exploitation requires a victim browser to reach the connector; the request persists an attacker-chosen mount in that session and makes the server send supplied credentials to an attacker-chosen FTP endpoint.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-81890
- Published
- Aug 31, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 1, 2026
- Vendor
- Studio 42 Ltd.
- Product
- elFinder
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 31, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 1, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 2.1.70
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Upstream safe local netmount CSRF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo