CVE-2026-80114Public exploit

Local physical-memory writes via hard-coded MAC key

Published Sep 4, 2026 · Updated Sep 4, 2026

Hard-coded credentials in DirectIo64.sys in PassMark PerformanceTest, BurnInTest, and OSForensics allow local users to write physical memory. The driver accepts MD5 tags derived from an embedded eight-byte key, while its bit-clear IOCTL can alter the write-path gate so later requests skip MAC, size, and Vendor ID checks. A low-privileged process must obtain a driver handle; affected releases are PerformanceTest before 11.1 build 1012, BurnInTest before 11.1 build 1000, and OSForensics before 11.1 build 1016, and successful writes can alter kernel memory and support elevation to SYSTEM.

CVSS severity8.5
High
EPSS probability0.13%
Next 30 days · Sep 16, 2026
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Based on sourced intelligence
Hinoki checkNot available
Coverage for this vulnerability

See if you're affected

Explore vulnerability checks for your environment with Hinoki.

Book a demo

Summary

What happened

Hard-coded credentials in DirectIo64.sys in PassMark PerformanceTest, BurnInTest, and OSForensics allow local users to write physical memory. The driver accepts MD5 tags derived from an embedded eight-byte key, while its bit-clear IOCTL can alter the write-path gate so later requests skip MAC, size, and Vendor ID checks. A low-privileged process must obtain a driver handle; affected releases are PerformanceTest before 11.1 build 1012, BurnInTest before 11.1 build 1000, and OSForensics before 11.1 build 1016, and successful writes can alter kernel memory and support elevation to SYSTEM.

The record

CVE
CVE-2026-80114
Published
Sep 4, 2026
Updated
Sep 4, 2026
Vendor
PassMark Software
Product
BurnInTest
Classifications
CWE-321, T1068
Attack vector
local
Privileges
authenticated

Timeline

How it unfolded

  1. Sep 4, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
  2. Sep 4, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.

Exploitability

Present is not the same as exploitable

Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.

Is a vulnerable build present?

Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.

  1. Affected versionversion=0 <11.1 build 1000

What conditions does exploitation require?

Attack vectorlocal
Required privilegesauthenticated

What is affected?

PassMark Software · BurnInTestversion=0 <11.1 build 1000
PassMark Software · OSForensicsversion=0 <11.1 build 1016
PassMark Software · PerformanceTestversion=0 <11.1 build 1012

Published CVSS scores

7.8floppywiggler directio64-disclosureCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
8.5VulnCheckCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.

Attacks

What attackers are doing with it

Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.

Daily unique IPsNo honeypot observations are available for this CVE in the selected window.

No observations available

Sep 10, 2026Sep 16, 2026
Latest reporting daySep 16, 2026
Latest daily unique IPsUnavailable
Prior 30-day averageUnavailable
SourceShadowserver honeypots (KEV)
Vectorlocal
Privilegesauthenticated
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Public exploitPublished

Weakness, pattern, technique

CWE-321Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalation

Public exploit references

Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.

Technologies

Your stack

See the directory against your own environment.

Your stack

Check the software in your environment

Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.

Book a demo