Local container escape via unrestricted system calls
Published Sep 10, 2026 · Updated Sep 10, 2026
Container isolation failure in IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.5 allows local users to escape to the host. The deployed container permits unrestricted system calls instead of enforcing a syscall restriction profile, leaving host-impacting kernel interfaces reachable from inside the workload. Exploitation requires low-privileged access inside an affected application container; a successful escape crosses the container boundary and grants access to the underlying host.
Summary
What happened
Container isolation failure in IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.5 allows local users to escape to the host. The deployed container permits unrestricted system calls instead of enforcing a syscall restriction profile, leaving host-impacting kernel interfaces reachable from inside the workload. Exploitation requires low-privileged access inside an affected application container; a successful escape crosses the container boundary and grants access to the underlying host.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-75777
- Published
- Sep 10, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 10, 2026
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- IBM Aspera Enterprise Webapps
- Classifications
- T1611
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 10, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0.0 <=1.0.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo