Plaintext recovery via deterministic KEM fallback
Published Aug 17, 2026 · Updated Aug 17, 2026
Weak shared-secret generation in jahlives OpenSSL Encrypt before 1.4.0 allows attackers to decrypt ciphertext via KEM failure fallback. In openssl_encrypt/modules/pqc.py, decrypt() silently substitutes a simulation secret computed from encapsulated_key and public_key_part(private_key), while public_key_part() returns only the first 16 private-key bytes. Any KEM decapsulation error reaches this path without a hard failure, so attackers who know those 16 bytes and the public encapsulated key can recover plaintext from affected ciphertexts.
Summary
What happened
Weak shared-secret generation in jahlives OpenSSL Encrypt before 1.4.0 allows attackers to decrypt ciphertext via KEM failure fallback. In openssl_encrypt/modules/pqc.py, decrypt() silently substitutes a simulation secret computed from encapsulated_key and public_key_part(private_key), while public_key_part() returns only the first 16 private-key bytes. Any KEM decapsulation error reaches this path without a hard failure, so attackers who know those 16 bytes and the public encapsulated key can recover plaintext from affected ciphertexts.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-74900
- Published
- Aug 17, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 17, 2026
- Vendor
- jahlives
- Product
- OpenSSL Encrypt
- Classifications
- CWE-391
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 17, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 17, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <1.4.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo