Memory corruption via stale fastmap pointer republishing
Published Aug 21, 2026 · Updated Aug 25, 2026
Use-after-free in the Linux kernel cls_route classifier allows local users to corrupt memory by racing filter deletion with packet classification. An in-flight route4_classify reader can republish a filter pointer after route4_reset_fastmap clears the cache and schedules that filter for RCU-deferred freeing. Reachability requires concurrent filter changes and classification on the same id and interface tuple; the demonstrated result is a stale-memory read and kernel instability.
Summary
What happened
Use-after-free in the Linux kernel cls_route classifier allows local users to corrupt memory by racing filter deletion with packet classification. An in-flight route4_classify reader can republish a filter pointer after route4_reset_fastmap clears the cache and schedules that filter for RCU-deferred freeing. Reachability requires concurrent filter changes and classification on the same id and interface tuple; the demonstrated result is a stale-memory read and kernel instability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-74583
- Published
- Aug 21, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 25, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-825, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 21, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 25, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <0e7a8cf8895b06d07c7311f028eba16ad742b9bc
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <47d7f7051253bdc02b1d245d87e38f16d31a74df
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <5ec9001be6d0eb527251125632ec8fe88278897f
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <7897198b26445b4009a057bda1986b94a99e5d5f
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <820f083c294ad6d319c02a7d43294f2ed2565139
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <a17f636c9330eac879822ce29f998e5abd1b72c1
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <ae9aff87025219005a2d16b4fe83d6f24643e50d
- Affected versionversion=1109c00547fc66df45b9ff923544be4c1e1bec13 <b969984b2bdc85d721ce4047cd270cd37ec705a2
- Affected versionversion=3.18
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo