CVE-2026-73973Public exploit

Arbitrary root file disclosure via unconfined --filename

Published Aug 18, 2026 · Updated Aug 19, 2026

Path traversal in the logfile plugin in Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins before 7.0.0 allows local users to read root-readable files via --filename. After time-macro expansion, the plugin passes the supplied path to Python open() while running as root and returns matched lines through warn_matches and lib.base.oao() without real-path containment or a log-directory allowlist. Exploitation requires control of the nagios or icinga account, or another local path to the sudo-whitelisted check; the direct impact is file disclosure, and privilege escalation depends on secrets exposed by the chosen file.

CVSS severity5.5
Medium
EPSS probability0.30%
Next 30 days · Sep 16, 2026
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Based on sourced intelligence
Hinoki checkNot available
Coverage for this vulnerability

See if you're affected

Explore vulnerability checks for your environment with Hinoki.

Book a demo

Summary

What happened

Path traversal in the logfile plugin in Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins before 7.0.0 allows local users to read root-readable files via --filename. After time-macro expansion, the plugin passes the supplied path to Python open() while running as root and returns matched lines through warn_matches and lib.base.oao() without real-path containment or a log-directory allowlist. Exploitation requires control of the nagios or icinga account, or another local path to the sudo-whitelisted check; the direct impact is file disclosure, and privilege escalation depends on secrets exposed by the chosen file.

The record

CVE
CVE-2026-73973
Published
Aug 18, 2026
Updated
Aug 19, 2026
Vendor
Linuxfabrik
Product
Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins
Classifications
CWE-22, CWE-269, T1005
Attack vector
local
Privileges
authenticated

Timeline

How it unfolded

  1. Aug 18, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
  2. Aug 19, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.

Exploitability

Present is not the same as exploitable

Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.

Is a vulnerable build present?

Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.

  1. Affected versionversion=< 7.0.0

What conditions does exploitation require?

Attack vectorlocal
Required privilegesauthenticated

What is affected?

Linuxfabrik · Linuxfabrik Monitoring Pluginsversion=< 7.0.0

Published CVSS scores

5.5GitHubCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.

Attacks

What attackers are doing with it

Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.

Daily unique IPsNo honeypot observations are available for this CVE in the selected window.

No observations available

Sep 10, 2026Sep 16, 2026
Latest reporting daySep 16, 2026
Latest daily unique IPsUnavailable
Prior 30-day averageUnavailable
SourceShadowserver honeypots (KEV)
Vectorlocal
Privilegesauthenticated
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Public exploitPublished

Weakness, pattern, technique

CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CWE-269Improper Privilege Management
T1005Data from Local System

Public exploit references

Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.

Technologies

Your stack

See the directory against your own environment.

Your stack

Check the software in your environment

Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.

Book a demo