Kernel compromise via stale ipset comment pointer
Published Aug 15, 2026 · Updated Aug 15, 2026
Memory corruption in the Linux kernel netfilter ipset component allows local users to compromise the kernel through crafted comment updates. The comment-extension path calls kfree_rcu() before replacing the published RCU pointer, so concurrent LIST or SAVE readers dereference freed comment memory. A low-privileged user with CAP_NET_ADMIN in a user and network namespace can trigger kernel disclosure, corruption, privilege escalation, or a crash without user interaction.
Summary
What happened
Memory corruption in the Linux kernel netfilter ipset component allows local users to compromise the kernel through crafted comment updates. The comment-extension path calls kfree_rcu() before replacing the published RCU pointer, so concurrent LIST or SAVE readers dereference freed comment memory. A low-privileged user with CAP_NET_ADMIN in a user and network namespace can trigger kernel disclosure, corruption, privilege escalation, or a crash without user interaction.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-72435
- Published
- Aug 15, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 15, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-825, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 15, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 15, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.2
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <3ca9982a8882470aa0ac4e8bb9a552b181d1efcd
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <50b70f56f3baaff46599f59b2d93fa2540120776
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <6e98407cb94e035bba98956adc9096a76d8b2a9f
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <8087bb360a936a6314d22b567e4b861656943eb6
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <93a775fd67f3ef34949a9523bfa69403ee74efdd
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <c9787d7c24ffd83019f379455e1b97fb4f0f75eb
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <d01b4b471f0fc5c396af62845e972ccf99cee29a
- Affected versionversion=b57b2d1fa53fe8563bdfc66a33b844463b9af285 <fcb565966534909377a16be5f7b065db2e25c8b5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo