Command injection via unquoted shell variables
Published Aug 17, 2026 · Updated Aug 17, 2026
Command injection in OpenShift-Metal3 FakeFish before 526550a allows remote authenticated users to alter cluster state via crafted Image or credential values. The VirtualMedia.InsertMedia handler passes the request Image to custom_scripts/mountcd.sh, and backend scripts such as kubevirt_scripts/mountcd.sh and dell_scripts/mountcd.sh interpolate the Image URL, BMC username, and BMC password into shell commands and oc-applied YAML without consistent quoting or validation. Exposure depends on whether attackers can reach FakeFish endpoints that feed those scripts; on the KubeVirt backend, the Image path can create arbitrary cluster resources with the mounted KUBECONFIG, while vendor-specific backends mainly expose command-line injection into management tools.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in OpenShift-Metal3 FakeFish before 526550a allows remote authenticated users to alter cluster state via crafted Image or credential values. The VirtualMedia.InsertMedia handler passes the request Image to custom_scripts/mountcd.sh, and backend scripts such as kubevirt_scripts/mountcd.sh and dell_scripts/mountcd.sh interpolate the Image URL, BMC username, and BMC password into shell commands and oc-applied YAML without consistent quoting or validation. Exposure depends on whether attackers can reach FakeFish endpoints that feed those scripts; on the KubeVirt backend, the Image path can create arbitrary cluster resources with the mounted KUBECONFIG, while vendor-specific backends mainly expose command-line injection into management tools.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-71567
- Published
- Aug 17, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 17, 2026
- Vendor
- OpenShift-Metal3
- Product
- FakeFish
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 17, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 17, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=28f9a6b
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo