Heap corruption via wrapped font allocation
Published Aug 10, 2026 · Updated Aug 10, 2026
Integer overflow in GNU Emacs for Android 30.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to corrupt heap memory via a crafted TrueType font. sfnt_read_name_table() uses an unchecked 32-bit font length to size an allocation, allowing wraparound before read() writes into the undersized buffer. Exploitation requires a 32-bit Android build and user-driven font loading through email, EWW, or a document with custom faces.
Summary
What happened
Integer overflow in GNU Emacs for Android 30.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to corrupt heap memory via a crafted TrueType font. sfnt_read_name_table() uses an unchecked 32-bit font length to size an allocation, allowing wraparound before read() writes into the undersized buffer. Exploitation requires a 32-bit Android build and user-driven font loading through email, EWW, or a document with custom faces.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-71393
- Published
- Aug 10, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 10, 2026
- Vendor
- The GnuPG Project
- Product
- GNU Emacs
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 10, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=30.2 changes=[{"at":"commit d51a4722316efe0960994d371e1859099894d1ca","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo