Unauthenticated command execution via management agent
Published Sep 8, 2026 · Updated Sep 8, 2026
OS command injection in Hitachi Cosminexus Component Container allows remote attackers to execute commands through its operation management agent. Hitachi identifies that agent as the vulnerable locus but has not published the input field, command-construction path, or missing neutralization. Network access without authentication or user interaction is sufficient, and successful exploitation compromises host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in Hitachi Cosminexus Component Container allows remote attackers to execute commands through its operation management agent. Hitachi identifies that agent as the vulnerable locus but has not published the input field, command-construction path, or missing neutralization. Network access without authentication or user interaction is sufficient, and successful exploitation compromises host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-71376
- Published
- Sep 8, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Hitachi
- Product
- Cosminexus Component Container
- Classifications
- CWE-78, CAPEC-88, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 8, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=09-00 <=09-00-18
- Affected versionversion=09-50 <=09-50-22
- Affected versionversion=09-70 <09-70-28 changes=[{"at":"09-70-28","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=09-80 <09-80-05 changes=[{"at":"09-80-05","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=09-87 <09-87-10 changes=[{"at":"09-87-10","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11-00 <11-00-13 changes=[{"at":"11-00-13","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11-10 <=11-10-11
- Affected versionversion=11-20 <11-20-10 changes=[{"at":"11-20-10","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11-30 <=11-30-08
- Affected versionversion=11-40 <=11-40-03
- Affected versionversion=11-50 <=11-50-03
- Affected versionversion=11-60 <11-60-03 changes=[{"at":"11-60-03","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11-70-01 <11-70-03 changes=[{"at":"11-70-03","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo