Process crash via unchecked crop offsets
Published Aug 5, 2026 · Updated Aug 5, 2026
Integer underflow in Raster 0.2.1 and earlier allows attackers to crash calling processes via crafted crop offsets. The crop() function subtracts an oversized offset from a source-bounded dimension and passes the negative i32 to Image::blank(), where conversion to usize triggers a Vec::with_capacity() panic. Exploitation requires an application to pass attacker-controlled crop coordinates; the demonstrated consequence is process termination without memory corruption.
Summary
What happened
Integer underflow in Raster 0.2.1 and earlier allows attackers to crash calling processes via crafted crop offsets. The crop() function subtracts an oversized offset from a source-bounded dimension and passes the negative i32 to Image::blank(), where conversion to usize triggers a Vec::with_capacity() panic. Exploitation requires an application to pass attacker-controlled crop coordinates; the demonstrated consequence is process termination without memory corruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-71202
- Published
- Aug 5, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2026
- Vendor
- kosinix
- Product
- Raster
- Classifications
- CWE-191, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 5, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=0.2.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Raster crop-offset capacity-overflow reproductionproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo