Privilege retention via stale role assignments
Published Aug 18, 2026 · Updated Aug 19, 2026
Improper access control in Frangoteam FUXA before 1.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to retain revoked permissions via role deletion. In DELETE /api/roles, server/runtime/users/usrstorage.js deletes the role record but leaves that role ID in persisted users' info.roles arrays, and server/runtime/users/index.js leaves the stale assignment in the runtime usersMap cache. Exposure requires a permission rule that still references the deleted role and a previously assigned account; that account can continue reading role-gated data and create misleading access-control and audit state until the stale assignments are removed.
Summary
What happened
Improper access control in Frangoteam FUXA before 1.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to retain revoked permissions via role deletion. In DELETE /api/roles, server/runtime/users/usrstorage.js deletes the role record but leaves that role ID in persisted users' info.roles arrays, and server/runtime/users/index.js leaves the stale assignment in the runtime usersMap cache. Exposure requires a permission rule that still references the deleted role and a previously assigned account; that account can continue reading role-gated data and create misleading access-control and audit state until the stale assignments are removed.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-67442
- Published
- Aug 18, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 19, 2026
- Vendor
- Frangoteam
- Product
- FUXA
- Classifications
- CWE-284, CWE-459, T0859
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 18, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 19, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.3.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo