Cookie disclosure via lost host-only scope
Published Aug 1, 2026 · Updated Aug 1, 2026
Information disclosure in Guzzle before 7.15.1 allows remote attackers controlling child hosts to receive parent-host cookies. CookieJar replaces an absent or empty Domain attribute with the request host, then applies ordinary domain matching instead of recording host-only state. Exploitation requires enabled cookie support, one built-in jar reused across trust boundaries, and a later request to a less-trusted child host; exposed cookies can include session identifiers or authorization tokens.
Summary
What happened
Information disclosure in Guzzle before 7.15.1 allows remote attackers controlling child hosts to receive parent-host cookies. CookieJar replaces an absent or empty Domain attribute with the request host, then applies ordinary domain matching instead of recording host-only state. Exploitation requires enabled cookie support, one built-in jar reused across trust boundaries, and a later request to a less-trusted child host; exposed cookies can include session identifiers or authorization tokens.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-67355
- Published
- Aug 1, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 1, 2026
- Vendor
- Guzzle
- Product
- Guzzle
- Classifications
- CWE-941, CWE-201, T1539
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 1, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 1, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <7.15.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo