Rejected after erroneous vulnerability determination
Published Jul 1, 2026 · Updated Jul 1, 2026
The CNA rejected the reported dirty-cache flaw in FatFs after confirming that the vulnerability determination was erroneous. The withdrawn report alleged that unsigned subtraction in f_read() and f_write() skipped stale dirty-cache handling during fragmented-file access. The current CVE record removes the affected-version claim, CWE mapping, severity assessment, and proof-of-concept status, so no exploitable condition remains attributed to this identifier.
Summary
What happened
The CNA rejected the reported dirty-cache flaw in FatFs after confirming that the vulnerability determination was erroneous. The withdrawn report alleged that unsigned subtraction in f_read() and f_write() skipped stale dirty-cache handling during fragmented-file access. The current CVE record removes the affected-version claim, CWE mapping, severity assessment, and proof-of-concept status, so no exploitable condition remains attributed to this identifier.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-6685
- Published
- Jul 1, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- Vendor
- ChaN
- Product
- FatFs
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- Unavailable
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 1, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 1, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=R0.16
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo