Request smuggling via promoted obs-fold header
Published Sep 1, 2026 · Updated Sep 1, 2026
HTTP request smuggling in Erlang/OTP inets httpd before 27.3.4.17, 28.5.0.6, or 29.0.6 allows remote attackers to alter requests. The parser strips leading whitespace from an obs-fold continuation and promotes its content to a standalone header, exposing a hidden Transfer-Encoding header. Exploitation requires a folding-aware reverse proxy in front of httpd and can desynchronize request boundaries so leftover bytes become the next request.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in Erlang/OTP inets httpd before 27.3.4.17, 28.5.0.6, or 29.0.6 allows remote attackers to alter requests. The parser strips leading whitespace from an obs-fold continuation and promotes its content to a standalone header, exposing a hidden Transfer-Encoding header. Exploitation requires a folding-aware reverse proxy in front of httpd and can desynchronize request boundaries so leftover bytes become the next request.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-66357
- Published
- Sep 1, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 1, 2026
- Vendor
- Erlang
- Product
- Erlang/OTP
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 1, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 1, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=17.0 <27.3.4.17
- Affected versionversion=28.0 <28.5.0.6
- Affected versionversion=29.0 <29.0.6
- Affected versionversion=5.10 <9.3.2.7
- Affected versionversion=84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 <* changes=[{"at":"220d618d2479a7180b4a06d0c5aacfaa4af4a85b","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"273d8958de38ff2a7fe0c5dcc5b6bfe6f65717f3","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"e640d599287d2eba919e6f13b91f042d7dbe6ff4","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=9.4 <9.6.2.3
- Affected versionversion=9.7 <9.7.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Upstream obs-fold CL.TE demonstrationproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo