Information disclosure via disabled hostname matcher
Published Jul 27, 2026 · Updated Jul 27, 2026
Certificate validation in Apache Thrift Python bindings before 0.24.0 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read RPC data. TSSLSocket defines _match_hostname as a no-op lambda instead of importing sslcompat._match_hostname, so Python versions before 3.12 accept a trusted certificate issued for another host. Exploitation requires a network position between the client and server plus a CA-trusted mismatched certificate; confidentiality is affected, not integrity or availability.
Summary
What happened
Certificate validation in Apache Thrift Python bindings before 0.24.0 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read RPC data. TSSLSocket defines _match_hostname as a no-op lambda instead of importing sslcompat._match_hostname, so Python versions before 3.12 accept a trusted certificate issued for another host. Exploitation requires a network position between the client and server plus a CA-trusted mismatched certificate; confidentiality is affected, not integrity or availability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-66053
- Published
- Jul 27, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 27, 2026
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- Classifications
- CWE-297, T1557
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 27, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 27, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <0.24.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo