Traffic interception via mismatched TLS certificates
Published Aug 10, 2026 · Updated Aug 10, 2026
TLS hostname verification in Apache Ranger 2.8.0 and earlier allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read intercepted client traffic. Ranger clients accept a CA-trusted certificate whose identity does not match the requested server hostname; Apache has not identified the affected client classes or published the faulty verification operation. Reachability requires an attacker positioned on the client-to-server network path, and the published impact is limited to confidentiality.
Summary
What happened
TLS hostname verification in Apache Ranger 2.8.0 and earlier allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read intercepted client traffic. Ranger clients accept a CA-trusted certificate whose identity does not match the requested server hostname; Apache has not identified the affected client classes or published the faulty verification operation. Reachability requires an attacker positioned on the client-to-server network path, and the published impact is limited to confidentiality.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-65942
- Published
- Aug 10, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 10, 2026
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache Ranger
- Classifications
- CWE-297, T1557
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 10, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.8.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo