Guest-to-host code execution via shadow-page use-after-free
Published Aug 4, 2026 · Updated Aug 4, 2026
Use-after-free in KVM/x86 in affected Linux kernels allows guest OS users to execute code as root on the host through nested virtualization. The recursive shadow-MMU zap path reclaims an in-use root, then fault handling maps through that invalid root and creates invalid child pages on the active list, enabling host-kernel list corruption. Exploitation requires root in a nested-capable guest; AMD hosts have no additional constraint, while Intel hosts must expose both four- and five-level EPT walks, and successful exploitation compromises the host and co-located guests.
Summary
What happened
Use-after-free in KVM/x86 in affected Linux kernels allows guest OS users to execute code as root on the host through nested virtualization. The recursive shadow-MMU zap path reclaims an in-use root, then fault handling maps through that invalid root and creates invalid child pages on the active list, enabling host-kernel list corruption. Exploitation requires root in a nested-capable guest; AMD hosts have no additional constraint, while Intel hosts must expose both four- and five-level EPT walks, and successful exploitation compromises the host and co-located guests.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-64561
- Published
- Aug 4, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-825, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 4, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.9
- Affected versionversion=f95eec9bed76d42194c23153cb1cc8f186bf91cb <0026dbb7de8ea76e97d6edf42fc3cc084564e2bf
- Affected versionversion=f95eec9bed76d42194c23153cb1cc8f186bf91cb <2abd5287f08319fa35764566b15c6e22cb1068db
- Affected versionversion=f95eec9bed76d42194c23153cb1cc8f186bf91cb <35e77467610c4a37cb0ff54ee56b85f73b1f5700
- Affected versionversion=f95eec9bed76d42194c23153cb1cc8f186bf91cb <bce0d3c26e2c761a4bf43c8949f333fc7374eb2d
- Affected versionversion=f95eec9bed76d42194c23153cb1cc8f186bf91cb <f3477a6a4164f15287444eda685b5f6405dbd1e5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Zapscape KVM/x86 guest-to-host PoCproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo