Kernel crash via stale Bluetooth command state
Published Jul 25, 2026 · Updated Jul 25, 2026
NULL-pointer dereference in Linux Kernel Bluetooth connection handling allows attackers to crash the kernel during connection cancellation. hci_abort_conn() passes hdev->sent_cmd to hci_skb_event() while req_status remains HCI_REQ_PEND even though sent_cmd can be NULL, causing a general protection fault in hci_rx_work(). Triggering the crash requires a pending Bluetooth connection to enter this inconsistent command state; the reported consequence is a kernel service interruption.
Summary
What happened
NULL-pointer dereference in Linux Kernel Bluetooth connection handling allows attackers to crash the kernel during connection cancellation. hci_abort_conn() passes hdev->sent_cmd to hci_skb_event() while req_status remains HCI_REQ_PEND even though sent_cmd can be NULL, causing a general protection fault in hci_rx_work(). Triggering the crash requires a pending Bluetooth connection to enter this inconsistent command state; the reported consequence is a kernel service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-64405
- Published
- Jul 25, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 25, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-476, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 25, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 25, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4ab81f16c68a602b2b69e333ae08d8748a9398de
- Affected versionversion=6083089ab00631617f9eac678df3ab050a9d837a <903227b6168bb99fd57d4e3c9c1b5014986198e0
- Affected versionversion=6.1.83 <6.1.118
- Affected versionversion=6.4.16 <6.5
- Affected versionversion=6.5.3 <6.6
- Affected versionversion=6.6
- Affected versionversion=a13f316e90fdb1fb6df6582e845aa9b3270f3581 <12917f591cea1af36087dba5b9ec888652f0b42a
- Affected versionversion=a13f316e90fdb1fb6df6582e845aa9b3270f3581 <61701912c58a05f6a043f097cc177a964abef348
- Affected versionversion=a13f316e90fdb1fb6df6582e845aa9b3270f3581 <70c397b62ee015e19b3924d9da741c8dda017819
- Affected versionversion=a13f316e90fdb1fb6df6582e845aa9b3270f3581 <83b22d7f7c384564fa42c3cf19bec715c693d7a2
- Affected versionversion=a13f316e90fdb1fb6df6582e845aa9b3270f3581 <b42cb640a0493d16b61ddd267420274be15efdc1
- Affected versionversion=e4511a67fcdba9729d1c7cfc6d2e645c765ce801
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo