Denial of service via compound PDU buffer leak
Published Jul 25, 2026 · Updated Jul 25, 2026
Memory leak in the Linux kernel SMB client allows local users to exhaust kernel memory through crafted encrypted compound PDUs. receive_encrypted_standard() allocates next_buffer before checking MAX_COMPOUND, then returns without attaching or freeing it when the limit is reached. Exploitation requires low-privileged access to connect the SMB client to an attacker-controlled server that repeatedly sends over-limit compounds, causing service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Memory leak in the Linux kernel SMB client allows local users to exhaust kernel memory through crafted encrypted compound PDUs. receive_encrypted_standard() allocates next_buffer before checking MAX_COMPOUND, then returns without attaching or freeing it when the limit is reached. Exploitation requires low-privileged access to connect the SMB client to an attacker-controlled server that repeatedly sends over-limit compounds, causing service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-64381
- Published
- Jul 25, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 25, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-772, T1499.001
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 25, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 25, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.19
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <07e0ab81df1790afa35732a4e8e07ff831b29008
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <1c6267a1d5cf4c73b656f8181b310cbbb3e4767b
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <297243e365fc9fe2f8e9b7dd535a65d922cd108b
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <67097772df7791c53d608f04bd31c676ccf79b83
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <68fc0b6cc03ca58060c0f36454e169f5fe258974
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <9136a08dc29328edd9867f2545e73906ac9df93b
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <927d4805aea0a287d36dd4f826ee24d69a2afee3
- Affected versionversion=b24df3e30cbf48255db866720fb71f14bf9d2f39 <94e4f672db029414b9888b5137a7559f1febf2d8
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo