Adjacent frame replay via packet-number wraparound
Published Jul 19, 2026 · Updated Jul 19, 2026
Replay-protection bypass in the Linux Kernel MACsec subsystem allows man-in-the-middle attackers to replay an XPN frame indefinitely. The macsec_post_decrypt() path increments a 32-bit packet number at U32_MAX, wraps it to zero, and skips updating next_pn_halves, so macsec_decrypt() reconstructs the same IV. Exploitation requires an XPN association with replay protection and capture of its legitimate 0xFFFFFFFF frame, enabling repeated authenticated-payload delivery and service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Replay-protection bypass in the Linux Kernel MACsec subsystem allows man-in-the-middle attackers to replay an XPN frame indefinitely. The macsec_post_decrypt() path increments a 32-bit packet number at U32_MAX, wraps it to zero, and skips updating next_pn_halves, so macsec_decrypt() reconstructs the same IV. Exploitation requires an XPN association with replay protection and capture of its legitimate 0xFFFFFFFF frame, enabling repeated authenticated-payload delivery and service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-63925
- Published
- Jul 19, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 19, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-294, T1557
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 19, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 19, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.7
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <23c0e230eab397d7f68be2538790ac41d3bb91fd
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <679e13a65e68a67c8b3c0467c02ee89157ec6f0f
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <6d00f5c7e5ff7ec4795b7f5f8ed88bd346641652
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <79495a1b0944fe31ffd54b54b00211b493590d62
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <d15130461df388136b62a7b0ce9f66e7e2fa9ff1
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <d55acbe577db892b60547b6ef1c020b359331a6d
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <dd7306779c6ce1238f4cdc34f3c1f2246b854457
- Affected versionversion=a21ecf0e033807b976967286e6c392f48ee2049f <e68842b3356471ba56c882209f324613dac47f64
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo