Client heap corruption via wrong stream resize
Published Aug 19, 2026 · Updated Aug 21, 2026
Heap buffer overflow in FreeRDP before 3.28.0 allows remote attackers to crash clients and possibly execute code via crafted Opus audio PDUs. In libfreerdp/codec/dsp.c, freerdp_dsp_decode_opus checks capacity on context->common.buffer, but opus_decode writes decoded PCM into the caller-supplied out stream, so the 4096-byte rdpsnd buffer can be overrun by a large decoded frame. Exposure requires a client build with WITH_OPUS enabled and WITH_DSP_FFMPEG disabled; a malicious or man-in-the-middle RDP server that negotiates WAVE_FORMAT_OPUS can trigger heap corruption after connection with audio redirection active.
Summary
What happened
Heap buffer overflow in FreeRDP before 3.28.0 allows remote attackers to crash clients and possibly execute code via crafted Opus audio PDUs. In libfreerdp/codec/dsp.c, freerdp_dsp_decode_opus checks capacity on context->common.buffer, but opus_decode writes decoded PCM into the caller-supplied out stream, so the 4096-byte rdpsnd buffer can be overrun by a large decoded frame. Exposure requires a client build with WITH_OPUS enabled and WITH_DSP_FFMPEG disabled; a malicious or man-in-the-middle RDP server that negotiates WAVE_FORMAT_OPUS can trigger heap corruption after connection with audio redirection active.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-63633
- Published
- Aug 19, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 21, 2026
- Vendor
- FreeRDP
- Product
- FreeRDP
- Classifications
- CWE-122, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 19, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 21, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 3.28.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Self-contained Docker reproducer in GHSA-72j9-356v-88xqproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo