SQL injection via unescaped imported invoice fields
Published Aug 13, 2026 · Updated Aug 13, 2026
SQL injection in Zalktis before 2026.1.586 and before 2026.2.592 allows remote attackers to alter accounting queries via imported invoices. During UBL/PEPPOL e-invoice or e-commerce export import, affected paths concatenate partner-controlled text into SQL without parameterization or escaping and omit the Dazadi.sql_txt() helper. Exploitation requires a user to import a sender-controlled document, after which injected text can break out of a string literal and change query logic.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in Zalktis before 2026.1.586 and before 2026.2.592 allows remote attackers to alter accounting queries via imported invoices. During UBL/PEPPOL e-invoice or e-commerce export import, affected paths concatenate partner-controlled text into SQL without parameterization or escaping and omit the Dazadi.sql_txt() helper. Exploitation requires a user to import a sender-controlled document, after which injected text can break out of a string literal and change query logic.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-59109
- Published
- Aug 13, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 13, 2026
- Vendor
- Zalktis Programmas
- Product
- Zalktis
- Classifications
- CWE-89, CWE-20, CAPEC-66, CAPEC-7, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2026.1.586
- Affected versionversion=0 <2026.2.592
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- OffSeq crafted UBL invoice proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo