Video ownership transfer via unguarded GET request
Published Aug 22, 2026 · Updated Aug 22, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 allows remote authenticated users to transfer video ownership. objects/videoEditLight.php reads attacker-controlled request values and saves video fields without an authenticity check, while its filename and GET method bypass the automatic CSRF guard. An ordinary uploader can plant the request in a sanitized video-description image; an administrator's page view then changes ownership and other video metadata.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 allows remote authenticated users to transfer video ownership. objects/videoEditLight.php reads attacker-controlled request values and saves video fields without an authenticity check, while its filename and GET method bypass the automatic CSRF guard. An ordinary uploader can plant the request in a sanitized video-description image; an administrator's page view then changes ownership and other video metadata.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-58001
- Published
- Aug 22, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 22, 2026
- Vendor
- WWBN
- Product
- AVideo
- Classifications
- CWE-639, CWE-352, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 22, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 22, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=9c39d8c8b4c1f75540788d6b391740852ceb0732
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Stored image CSRF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo