DOM-based XSS via targetmarker shortcode
Published Jul 13, 2026 · Updated Jul 13, 2026
DOM-based XSS in hupe13 Extensions for Leaflet Map 5.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via targetmarker. The version 5.2 changelog identifies the targetmarker shortcode as the affected locus, but public records do not disclose which untrusted value reaches which DOM sink without neutralization. Exploitation is unauthenticated but requires a user to interact with crafted content, and executed script runs in the affected site's browser context.
Summary
What happened
DOM-based XSS in hupe13 Extensions for Leaflet Map 5.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via targetmarker. The version 5.2 changelog identifies the targetmarker shortcode as the affected locus, but public records do not disclose which untrusted value reaches which DOM sink without neutralization. Exploitation is unauthenticated but requires a user to interact with crafted content, and executed script runs in the affected site's browser context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-57380
- Published
- Jul 13, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 13, 2026
- Vendor
- hupe13
- Product
- Extensions for Leaflet Map
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CAPEC-588
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=5.1 changes=[{"at":"5.2","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo