Wireless service interruption via inverted MIC window check
Published Sep 8, 2026 · Updated Sep 10, 2026
Incorrect comparison in OpenBSD before commit 1ee99df allows physically proximate attackers to interrupt wireless service using TKIP frames. ieee80211_michael_mic_failure() returns when two MIC failures occur within 60 seconds and enters the countermeasure path only after that window expires. Exposure requires the non-default WPA1/TKIP configuration; an affected access point deauthenticates every TKIP station and blocks reassociation for up to 90 seconds.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect comparison in OpenBSD before commit 1ee99df allows physically proximate attackers to interrupt wireless service using TKIP frames. ieee80211_michael_mic_failure() returns when two MIC failures occur within 60 seconds and enters the countermeasure path only after that window expires. Exposure requires the non-default WPA1/TKIP configuration; an affected access point deauthenticates every TKIP station and blocks reassociation for up to 90 seconds.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-56101
- Published
- Sep 8, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 10, 2026
- Vendor
- OpenBSD Project
- Product
- OpenBSD
- Classifications
- CWE-697, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 8, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <1ee99dfcc4ddc87afc6395d5d3094e9d2314fb5a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo