Diagnostic command syntax disclosure via invalid input
Published May 19, 2026 · Updated May 19, 2026
Information disclosure in TP-Link Archer AX72 (SG) v1 before 1.4.6 allows local users with administrative privileges to view diagnostic syntax. The network diagnostic feature improperly processes invalid input and returns the diagnostic utility's valid command-line syntax and options. Administrative authentication to the router management interface is required, and disclosure is limited to utility presence and usage rather than sensitive system data.
Summary
What happened
Information disclosure in TP-Link Archer AX72 (SG) v1 before 1.4.6 allows local users with administrative privileges to view diagnostic syntax. The network diagnostic feature improperly processes invalid input and returns the diagnostic utility's valid command-line syntax and options. Administrative authentication to the router management interface is required, and disclosure is limited to utility presence and usage rather than sensitive system data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-5511
- Published
- May 19, 2026
- Updated
- May 19, 2026
- Vendor
- TP-Link Systems Inc.
- Product
- Archer AX72
- Classifications
- CWE-209, CAPEC-54, T1518
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 19, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 19, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <1.4.6 Build 20260112 rel.66206
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo