Privilege escalation via unsanitized RQL-to-SQL translation
Published Jul 29, 2026 · Updated Jul 29, 2026
SQL injection in DriveLock Enterprise Service allows remote authenticated users to escalate privileges through crafted RQL queries. The web service's RQL-to-SQL translation layer inserts user-controlled RQL content into SQL statements without proper validation or sanitization. Low-privileged authentication and network access to the service on its default TCP port 4568 are required; successful injection grants access to protected resources and sensitive data.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in DriveLock Enterprise Service allows remote authenticated users to escalate privileges through crafted RQL queries. The web service's RQL-to-SQL translation layer inserts user-controlled RQL content into SQL statements without proper validation or sanitization. Low-privileged authentication and network access to the service on its default TCP port 4568 are required; successful injection grants access to protected resources and sensitive data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-5490
- Published
- Jul 29, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 29, 2026
- Vendor
- DriveLock SE
- Product
- DriveLock
- Classifications
- CWE-89, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 29, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 29, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=25.2.2.61370
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo