Ignored-field writes via renamed property backing fields
Published Jun 23, 2026 · Updated Jun 23, 2026
Improper object modification in jackson-databind 2.21.0 through 2.21.3 and 3.0.0 through 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to write ignored fields. POJOPropertiesCollector._renameProperties() retains a private backing field when a getter is renamed and its setter is ignored, so BeanDeserializerFactory.addBeanProps() creates a writable FieldProperty for the attacker-controlled key. Exploitation requires an application to deserialize attacker-supplied JSON into this annotated property while the default INFER_PROPERTY_MUTATORS setting is enabled; the result is an unauthorized write to the backing field.
Summary
What happened
Improper object modification in jackson-databind 2.21.0 through 2.21.3 and 3.0.0 through 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to write ignored fields. POJOPropertiesCollector._renameProperties() retains a private backing field when a getter is renamed and its setter is ignored, so BeanDeserializerFactory.addBeanProps() creates a writable FieldProperty for the attacker-controlled key. Exploitation requires an application to deserialize attacker-supplied JSON into this annotated property while the default INFER_PROPERTY_MUTATORS setting is enabled; the result is an unauthorized write to the backing field.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-54516
- Published
- Jun 23, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- Vendor
- FasterXML
- Product
- jackson-databind
- Classifications
- CWE-915
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 23, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 23, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 2.21.0, < 2.21.4
- Affected versionversion=>= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- FasterXML renamed ignored-setter regression demonstrationproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo