Blind SSRF via unchecked redirect following
Published Aug 20, 2026 · Updated Aug 20, 2026
Server-side request forgery in TREK before 3.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to reach internal HTTP services via crafted redirector URLs. The importGoogleList(), importNaverList(), and resolveGoogleMapsUrl() sinks call checkSsrf() on only the initial URL and then use fetch() with redirect following, so each 30x Location hop is re-resolved without the DNS-pinned safeFetch path or any revalidation. Trip members can reach the list-import routes and any authenticated user can reach /api/maps/resolve-url; the result is blind GET-only access to loopback, RFC 1918, and cloud metadata endpoints, without response-body disclosure.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in TREK before 3.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to reach internal HTTP services via crafted redirector URLs. The importGoogleList(), importNaverList(), and resolveGoogleMapsUrl() sinks call checkSsrf() on only the initial URL and then use fetch() with redirect following, so each 30x Location hop is re-resolved without the DNS-pinned safeFetch path or any revalidation. Trip members can reach the list-import routes and any authenticated user can reach /api/maps/resolve-url; the result is blind GET-only access to loopback, RFC 1918, and cloud metadata endpoints, without response-body disclosure.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-54508
- Published
- Aug 20, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 20, 2026
- Vendor
- Liketrek
- Product
- TREK
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 20, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 20, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 3.1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub advisory proof of concept for redirect-follow SSRFproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo