Command execution via unnormalized trusted-prefix traversal
Published Jul 8, 2026 · Updated Jul 8, 2026
Path traversal in Copier 9.5.0 through 9.15.1 allows context-dependent attackers to execute commands through a crafted template URL. The trust check in copier/_settings.py applies raw string prefix matching without resolving dot segments, although the fetch path is normalized. Exploitation requires a configured trailing-slash trusted prefix and a user to update an attacker-controlled project, after which template tasks, migrations, or Jinja extensions run without the trust prompt.
Summary
What happened
Path traversal in Copier 9.5.0 through 9.15.1 allows context-dependent attackers to execute commands through a crafted template URL. The trust check in copier/_settings.py applies raw string prefix matching without resolving dot segments, although the fetch path is normalized. Exploitation requires a configured trailing-slash trusted prefix and a user to update an attacker-controlled project, after which template tasks, migrations, or Jinja extensions run without the trust prompt.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-53951
- Published
- Jul 8, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 8, 2026
- Vendor
- copier-org
- Product
- Copier
- Classifications
- CWE-94, CWE-22, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 8, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 9.5.0, < 9.15.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Upstream advisory proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo