Code execution via overflowed WavPack buffer allocation
Published Jun 15, 2026 · Updated Jun 15, 2026
Heap buffer overflow in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 through 10 allows remote attackers to corrupt memory through a crafted WavPack file. gst_wavpack_dec_handle_frame() multiplies block samples and channels in 32-bit arithmetic, passes the wrapped size to g_malloc(), and lets WavPack write decoded samples beyond the undersized heap buffer. A user must open the uncommon audio format; processing can crash the application or execute code in its context.
Summary
What happened
Heap buffer overflow in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 through 10 allows remote attackers to corrupt memory through a crafted WavPack file. gst_wavpack_dec_handle_frame() multiplies block samples and channels in 32-bit arithmetic, passes the wrapped size to g_malloc(), and lets WavPack write decoded samples beyond the undersized heap buffer. A user must open the uncommon audio format; processing can crash the application or execute code in its context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-53705
- Published
- Jun 15, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1204.002, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 15, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 15, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo