Data disclosure via provider-based SSRF guard bypass
Published Jul 21, 2026 · Updated Jul 21, 2026
SSRF in DayuanJiang next-ai-draw-io 0.4.13 allows remote attackers to disclose conversation data via crafted provider headers. The getAIModel guard in lib/ai-providers.ts trusts the client-controlled x-ai-provider header and exempts EdgeOne or default Ollama requests with a custom base URL but no API key. An unauthenticated HTTP request can redirect the server's chat completion call, exposing the system prompt, user messages, and diagram XML to an attacker-controlled endpoint.
Summary
What happened
SSRF in DayuanJiang next-ai-draw-io 0.4.13 allows remote attackers to disclose conversation data via crafted provider headers. The getAIModel guard in lib/ai-providers.ts trusts the client-controlled x-ai-provider header and exempts EdgeOne or default Ollama requests with a custom base URL but no API key. An unauthenticated HTTP request can redirect the server's chat completion call, exposing the system prompt, user messages, and diagram XML to an attacker-controlled endpoint.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-50756
- Published
- Jul 21, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 21, 2026
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 21, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 21, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo