Restricted usermeta modification via unchecked field selector
Published Apr 10, 2026 · Updated Apr 10, 2026
Missing authorization in UsersWP 1.2.58 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to clear restricted fields in their own user metadata. UsersWP_Forms::upload_file_remove() accepts the htmlvar AJAX parameter as a usermeta key without allowlisting permitted fields or checking the field's for_admin_use setting. Subscriber-level access is sufficient to reset admin-only metadata on the caller's account, but the record reports no ability to modify another user's data.
Summary
What happened
Missing authorization in UsersWP 1.2.58 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to clear restricted fields in their own user metadata. UsersWP_Forms::upload_file_remove() accepts the htmlvar AJAX parameter as a usermeta key without allowlisting permitted fields or checking the field's for_admin_use setting. Subscriber-level access is sufficient to reset admin-only metadata on the caller's account, but the record reports no ability to modify another user's data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-4977
- Published
- Apr 10, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 10, 2026
- Vendor
- AyeCode Ltd
- Product
- UsersWP
- Classifications
- CWE-862
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 10, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.2.58
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo