mTLS bypass via unstripped X-SSL-Client headers
Published May 29, 2026 · Updated Aug 25, 2026
Improper authentication in OpenShift Router in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform allows remote attackers to spoof mTLS identities via crafted HTTP requests. On Routes with insecureEdgeTerminationPolicy set to Allow, the HTTP frontend forwards attacker-supplied X-SSL-Client-* headers instead of stripping them before proxying to the backend. Exposure requires a route that accepts plain HTTP and a backend that trusts those headers as proof of client-certificate authentication, enabling identity impersonation rather than router compromise.
Summary
What happened
Improper authentication in OpenShift Router in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform allows remote attackers to spoof mTLS identities via crafted HTTP requests. On Routes with insecureEdgeTerminationPolicy set to Allow, the HTTP frontend forwards attacker-supplied X-SSL-Client-* headers instead of stripping them before proxying to the backend. Exposure requires a route that accepts plain HTTP and a backend that trusts those headers as proof of client-certificate authentication, enabling identity impersonation rather than router compromise.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-46579
- Published
- May 29, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 25, 2026
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-287, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 29, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 25, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo