Authenticated command execution via unsafe path expansion
Published Jun 5, 2026 · Updated Jun 5, 2026
OS command injection in Termix before 2.3.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands on connected SSH hosts. The resolvePath handler decodes the path parameter, escapes only double quotes, and interpolates the result into a double-quoted echo command, leaving command substitution active. A valid Termix account and an active File Manager SSH session are required; injected commands run with the connected SSH user's privileges and can read or write host data.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in Termix before 2.3.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands on connected SSH hosts. The resolvePath handler decodes the path parameter, escapes only double quotes, and interpolates the result into a double-quoted echo command, leaving command substitution active. A valid Termix account and an active File Manager SSH session are required; injected commands run with the connected SSH user's privileges and can read or write host data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-45744
- Published
- Jun 5, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 5, 2026
- Vendor
- Termix-SSH
- Product
- Termix
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 5, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 2.3.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-37f4-wq95-pg33 command-injection proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo