Authenticated code execution via copydir path underflow
Published Aug 14, 2026 · Updated Aug 14, 2026
Stack-based buffer overflow in Netatalk 3.1.19 through 4.4.2 allows remote authenticated users to crash afpd or execute code. The afpd copydir() fallback subtracts validated path lengths from current string lengths, underflowing srem and drem to SIZE_MAX so strcpy() appends overrun stack path buffers. Exploitation requires a cross-device directory move inside an AFP share; the corrupted worker can crash, while control-flow overwrite enables code execution.
Summary
What happened
Stack-based buffer overflow in Netatalk 3.1.19 through 4.4.2 allows remote authenticated users to crash afpd or execute code. The afpd copydir() fallback subtracts validated path lengths from current string lengths, underflowing srem and drem to SIZE_MAX so strcpy() appends overrun stack path buffers. Exploitation requires a cross-device directory move inside an AFP share; the corrupted worker can crash, while control-flow overwrite enables code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-45699
- Published
- Aug 14, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 14, 2026
- Vendor
- Netatalk
- Product
- Netatalk
- Classifications
- CWE-191, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 14, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 14, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 3.1.19, < 4.4.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo