Unauthenticated account takeover via SSO header injection
Published May 29, 2026 · Updated May 29, 2026
Authentication bypass in SillyTavern before 1.18.0 allows remote attackers to take over any account through forged SSO headers. The tryAutoLogin flow calls headerUserLogin for /login, which trusts client-supplied Remote-User or X-Authentik-Username values and creates a matching user's session without verifying the sender's proxy address. Exploitation requires sso.autheliaAuth or sso.authentikAuth to be enabled and direct network access to the application port; both settings are disabled by default, while a successful request grants the targeted user's privileges, including administrator access.
Summary
What happened
Authentication bypass in SillyTavern before 1.18.0 allows remote attackers to take over any account through forged SSO headers. The tryAutoLogin flow calls headerUserLogin for /login, which trusts client-supplied Remote-User or X-Authentik-Username values and creates a matching user's session without verifying the sender's proxy address. Exploitation requires sso.autheliaAuth or sso.authentikAuth to be enabled and direct network access to the application port; both settings are disabled by default, while a successful request grants the targeted user's privileges, including administrator access.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-44649
- Published
- May 29, 2026
- Updated
- May 29, 2026
- Vendor
- SillyTavern
- Product
- SillyTavern
- Classifications
- CWE-807, CWE-306, CWE-290, CWE-346, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 29, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 29, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.18.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA curl proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo