Login CSRF via unchecked SSO state token
Published May 12, 2026 · Updated May 12, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Warpgate before 0.23.3 allows remote authenticated users to force a user into an attacker-controlled SSO session. The SSO return handler in sso_provider_list.rs consumes the authorization code but never compares the returned state value with the csrf_token stored in SsoLoginRequest. Exploitation requires an authorized attacker and user interaction; the resulting session confusion can expose data entered into the attacker's SSH or HTTP target.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Warpgate before 0.23.3 allows remote authenticated users to force a user into an attacker-controlled SSO session. The SSO return handler in sso_provider_list.rs consumes the authorization code but never compares the returned state value with the csrf_token stored in SsoLoginRequest. Exploitation requires an authorized attacker and user interaction; the resulting session confusion can expose data entered into the attacker's SSH or HTTP target.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-44347
- Published
- May 12, 2026
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- Warptech Industries
- Product
- Warpgate
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 12, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.23.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Vendor SSO login CSRF proof-of-concept scenarioproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo