Code execution via unchecked CNID name length
Published May 21, 2026 · Updated May 21, 2026
Heap-based buffer overflow in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute code or crash the CNID service. The comm_rcv() function trusts rqst->namelen from the network and copies that many bytes into a 1,025-byte heap buffer without bounds validation. Exploitation requires access through an AFP session or the local CNID socket and a volume using the dbd backend; consequences include daemon-level code execution or a service crash.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute code or crash the CNID service. The comm_rcv() function trusts rqst->namelen from the network and copies that many bytes into a 1,025-byte heap buffer without bounds validation. Exploitation requires access through an AFP session or the local CNID socket and a volume using the dbd backend; consequences include daemon-level code execution or a service crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-44050
- Published
- May 21, 2026
- Updated
- May 21, 2026
- Vendor
- Netatalk
- Product
- Netatalk
- Classifications
- CWE-122, T1210
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 21, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 21, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.0.0 <=4.4.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Netatalk 4.4.2 disclosure package reproduction stepsproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo