SSE event injection via incomplete line-separator handling
Published May 11, 2026 · Updated May 11, 2026
CRLF injection in Nine Nines Cowlib 2.6.0 through 2.16.0 allows remote attackers to forge SSE events via crafted field values. cow_sse:event/1 rejects LF but not bare CR in id and event values, while prefix_lines/2 splits data and comments only on LF. An application must pass attacker-controlled fields into SSE generation; compliant clients can then parse injected lines as a new event and dispatch attacker-selected event types and data.
Summary
What happened
CRLF injection in Nine Nines Cowlib 2.6.0 through 2.16.0 allows remote attackers to forge SSE events via crafted field values. cow_sse:event/1 rejects LF but not bare CR in id and event values, while prefix_lines/2 splits data and comments only on LF. An application must pass attacker-controlled fields into SSE generation; compliant clients can then parse injected lines as a new event and dispatch attacker-selected event types and data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-43968
- Published
- May 11, 2026
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- Nine Nines
- Product
- Cowlib
- Classifications
- CWE-93, CAPEC-34, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 11, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.6.0
- Affected versionversion=93b2b897cde238506c803faad4d1602d79dba7c9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo