Local root escalation via lost shared-frag marker
Published May 23, 2026 · Updated May 23, 2026
Memory corruption in the Linux Kernel allows local users to gain root access through crafted socket-buffer fragment transfers. Fragment-transfer helpers move page-backed frags without preserving SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, so ESP decryption skips copy-on-write and overwrites a root-owned file page in cache. Exploitation requires local access and CAP_NET_ADMIN, obtainable through enabled unprivileged user namespaces; the bounded result is page-cache modification and root execution.
Summary
What happened
Memory corruption in the Linux Kernel allows local users to gain root access through crafted socket-buffer fragment transfers. Fragment-transfer helpers move page-backed frags without preserving SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, so ESP decryption skips copy-on-write and overwrites a root-owned file page in cache. Exploitation requires local access and CAP_NET_ADMIN, obtainable through enabled unprivileged user namespaces; the bounded result is page-cache modification and root execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-43503
- Published
- May 23, 2026
- Updated
- May 23, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-664, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 23, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 23, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.9
- Affected versionversion=cef401de7be8c4e155c6746bfccf721a4fa5fab9 <12401fcfb01f53ccc63ab0a3246570fe8f3105ee
- Affected versionversion=cef401de7be8c4e155c6746bfccf721a4fa5fab9 <179f1852bdedc300e373e807cc102cd81feff196
- Affected versionversion=cef401de7be8c4e155c6746bfccf721a4fa5fab9 <989214c66884d70716d83dc1d0bf5e16287bf349
- Affected versionversion=cef401de7be8c4e155c6746bfccf721a4fa5fab9 <9bc9d6d6967a2239aa57af2aa53554eddd640d20
- Affected versionversion=cef401de7be8c4e155c6746bfccf721a4fa5fab9 <fbeab9555564a1b98e8582cd106dfe46c4606991
- Affected versionversion=cef401de7be8c4e155c6746bfccf721a4fa5fab9 <fc6eb39c55e97df2f94ad974b8a5bbcd019da2c8
- Affected versionversion=cef401de7be8c4e155c6746bfccf721a4fa5fab9 <ff375cc75f9167168db38e0464a482d5fbc8d81d
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- DirtyClone CVE-2026-43503 proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo