Service disruption via async-unlink link-count underrun
Published May 8, 2026 · Updated May 8, 2026
Race condition in the CephFS client in Linux Kernel allows local users to disrupt filesystem service during asynchronous unlink. In ceph_unlink(), completion handling can set i_nlink to zero after request submission but before drop_nlink() decrements it without i_ceph_lock, causing an underrun and kernel warning. Reachability requires a mounted CephFS and the asynchronous-unlink path; the published reproduction demonstrates a warning rather than a confirmed kernel crash.
Summary
What happened
Race condition in the CephFS client in Linux Kernel allows local users to disrupt filesystem service during asynchronous unlink. In ceph_unlink(), completion handling can set i_nlink to zero after request submission but before drop_nlink() decrements it without i_ceph_lock, causing an underrun and kernel warning. Reachability requires a mounted CephFS and the asynchronous-unlink path; the published reproduction demonstrates a warning rather than a confirmed kernel crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-43420
- Published
- May 8, 2026
- Updated
- May 8, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-367, T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 8, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <6d5fd8bb574bef039eb3b738e523870433a2aeb9
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <7db008e85a5d17b64bc5390b828bf457ae91a415
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <8975b85b0d45ca811ace6fac5907652f2310e5ac
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <9b31e88ac5623d15c8bc46f69dfe1d3b43a8f67c
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <aedd29386b23f3e1e6818943e11abfff2953732f
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <b3f5513141ecc6b277a8f7b7efe58a0cf9a5e859
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <ce0123cbb4a40a2f1bbb815f292b26e96088639f
- Affected versionversion=2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f <fcc477a6e8856c8a42b3c9e171724d8d6dfadd06
- Affected versionversion=5.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo